Democracy producing an intended consequence
Abraham Lincoln's famous
statement, "government of the people, by the people, for the people,"
encapsulates the core ideals of democracy. The intended outcome of this
statement was for the people to empower themselves by electing leaders who
would prioritize their interests and decisions. The system aimed to place
government and representatives at the service of the people, assuming that
citizens possess the ability to discern the best leaders for their needs.
However, has this assumption truly worked in favor of the people?
The assumption hinges largely on
the conscious leadership of elected representatives, who are expected to act in
the best interests of the populace without succumbing to selfish motives.
Citizens, on the other hand, elect their leaders based on perceived
capabilities, often lacking deep understanding of the candidates' agendas. Yet,
this assumption faces threats from various social constructs such as tribal
affiliations, religious biases,money and racial prejudices. Additionally, a
lack of political education exacerbates the challenge of identifying
accountable and value-driven leaders.
Social factors often overshadow
the broader national interest during elections, leading to voting patterns
dictated by tribal, religious, or racial identities and buying of votes.
Political discourse becomes centered on divisive rhetoric rather than
substantive issues, blinding citizens to the importance of informed
decision-making. This phenomenon, prevalent in countries like Kenya, has
entrenched regional divisions, rendering cross-tribal campaigns futile and
perpetuating a cycle of tribal politics even at the grassroots level.
Economic status also plays a
significant role in elections, as citizens disillusioned by self-serving
leaders prioritize candidates who offer immediate financial gains. The
pervasive belief that politicians serve their own interests rather than those of
the populace fuels a culture of electoral bribery and corruption.
Many post-colonial nations,
having inherited democratic systems without adapting them to suit local needs
or addressing the diverse composition of their populations, have struggled to
uphold democratic ideals effectively. Without contextualizing democratic
principles to accommodate their unique circumstances, these countries have
faltered in achieving the intended outcomes of democracy, perpetuating cycles
of governance failures and societal divisions.
Ahmed Maalim
Comments
Post a Comment